Skip to content

makeUthink

Menu
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Philosophy
    • Politics
    • Life
    • Miscallaneous
  • Support Us
  • Explore Further
    • Books
    • Videos and Documentaries
    • Magazines and Publications
    • Affiliated Websites
  • About Us
Menu

BLM Part 1 – The Statues Debate

Posted on November 13, 2020November 19, 2020 by Duro Adebayo
pexels-mike-189528

Recently, a lot of attention has been focused on the issue of statues in relation to the BLM movement and the initiative to end systemic racism in the UK. Individuals have taken action with protests alongside spraying graffiti on statues, all culminating in the tearing down of slave trader Edward Colston’s statue in Bristol.

The debate is centered around whether statues of racist or slavery-involved historical figures should be torn down in light of this new social movement or left to remain as they are arguably a key part of British history.

Personally, I was surprised to see such wide coverage of the statues debate as it seems to be a low priority issue when compared to the other features of institutional racism.

This article will be split into two parts: firstly, addressing the problems with simply tearing down statues and secondly, potential solutions that may be more productive.


Problems

The immediate problem with the focus on statues is that solving this problem does very little to tackle the colossal issue of institutional racism: every statue could be removed but the socio-economic status of the black community would stay the same.

In addition to this, there is a compelling argument that these statues serve as a reminder and ‘evidence’ for the atrocities committed. If taken down it may be akin to ‘deleting the evidence’ and within a few generations people may forget that key events such as the slave trade were so widespread and significant. This would serve to detract from the ongoing reparations debate that seeks to give descendants of slaves some compensation for the events and trauma of the slave trade, similar to the reparations paid out by West Germany in the wake of the Holocaust.

On practical grounds, there is also the problem that almost all (pre)Victorian public figures shared in the views and perused business activities similar to those of Colston. This means that if statues of pro-slavery and racist figures are taken down, there may be very few statues left. Taking down such a large number of statues in the UK may seem perfectly sensible to some, but for many the historic and cultural value lost would be too great. This suggests that any feasible solution will have to be slightly more receptive to the complex nature of the problem.

 

Solution

Now that some of the problems have been highlighted, we can move on to what I view to be a viable solution.

First and foremost, as a community, we should prioritise the more pressing issues to do with systemic racism first. This includes the education system, workplace discrimination and policing but to name a few. If the same amount of airtime and resources were put into addressing these issues, we would undoubtedly see more justice done in relation to the BLM initiative.

With regards to the statues, I believe that the relevant institution associated with a statue should have the final decision about its removal. For example, the removal of statues in The University of Oxford should be discussed between the university body and the government.

For the statues that do get taken down, I think that they should be stored in museums with large plinths explaining what each figure has done. This should serve as a reminder to ensure that we have a more complete view of this country’s history. Most importantly, this enables people to educate themselves.

The aim is not to pretend that these people never existed, but to state that as a society we do not agree with their views and what they represented.

Perhaps slightly more controversial, I believe that some statues should be allowed to stay. Partly as a reminder for society, but also with the philosophical idea that we should detach the achievements and works of an individual from who they were as a character.

In the case of statues, we must ask whether we are celebrating the person or the achievement. I would suggest a blend of the two but more in favour of the person. If this is the case, then certain monuments and statues may need to be edited accordingly to ensure that we are celebrating the achievements; plaques ought to be changed to include the reality of the negative things that the person in question has done. This may not be applicable for those that were active slave traders, but figures such as Churchill who held unashamedly racist viewpoints could be allowed to stay due to their achievements, but with plaques giving a more rounded picture of their character.

All things considered, simply tearing down every statue of those involved in slavery (or those whose values we no longer agree with) may not be the most productive solution. Instead, we need to ensure that statues that are taken down get stored in museums and others be altered to reflect the truth of the person celebrated. Nevertheless, as I have said throughout this piece; the level of attention paid to this issue is certainly a step in the right direction. But whether these statues remain or not, we should not let it distract us from the initiatives for meaningful change.

 

© Durodoluwa Adebayo 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured publications

An article published in The Fatherland Magazine Issue 2

Recent Posts

  • Defend or Decolonize? The Falklands Revisited
  • The Benefits of Cashless Society
  • Can God be Reconciled With Science? The Kalām Cosmological Argument
  • The Ugly Truth Behind UK Football Academies
  • Our Disconnect With Information
  • Why There is No Right or Wrong

Categories

  • Economics
  • Life
  • Miscallaneous
  • Philosophy
  • Politics

Archives

  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020

Tags

BLM (1) current affairs (1) Longer (1) Morality (1) Shorter (1) war (1)
©2022 makeUthink
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.